I was speculating, over the weekend, the relative risk of the RUT versus the IWM.
So, I created a spreadsheet that computes profit, risk, probability of success and return on investment.
I think the results are interesting.
Assumptions:
On the IWM trades I tried to match the profit potential of the RUT.
As the spread increases and the number of options, so does the risk, while the ROI decreases.
It would appear that a single trade on the RUT is actually much less risky than putting on 15 IWM trades over a several day period.
What do you think?
This is what I wrote last night. In after hours trading the stock have moved up 14.6% to $66.5.

This is setup for a nice play to the upside. As you can see in the screenshot, there pretty much is no resistance till 71.2 level, and the gap fill goes up to $77.7. Considering the downtrend prior to the gap down, the $77.7 resistance should hold and stock should channel in $55-77 range for a period of time. Because of the high volatility I do not feel comfortable buying options, but I will be setting up iron condors for the 60-85 range. I don’t feel that $60 is strong resistance level, but there should be plenty of time in the next 24 days to close that leg with some gains
The reason I have opened a 65/60 leg is the lucrative 46% gain on the trade when the stock was at $63.0. Per what I’ve said earlier, I don’t think that I will keep this trade to expiration.
I hadn’t even checked the markets today when I got a message on my way to lunch that a trade had been closed out…
This was an automatically triggered buy back for a trade listed in an earlier post. The original sale was for 25 cents ($0.25). It was bought back for 2 cents, so the profit for this is 23 cents (multiplied by 100…more than once). TOS doesn’t charge commissions when closing a trade for less than 5 cents (yeah TOS!), so this was a commission free close.
Getting all but 2 cents and freeing up capital a week before expiration all without commissions…not too bad.
| Sell APR Call vertical | -190 / +195 |
| Credit $1.25 | Spread $5.00 |
| Probability of success | 72% |
| Short delta | .33 |

I bought an APR 27.5 PUT on (C) and a 40 APR PUT on (VZ). I plan on being out of these trades in 2 days, 3 at the most. I think both stocks will come down in the next 2 days (Thurs & Fri). They’ll probably have an up move on the third day (Mon) which is why I’d like to get out of them at the end of day 2 (Fri). Thaaaaats’ right, my magic ball told me that. Let’s see if I’m right.
| Sell APR Call vertical | -70 / +75 |
| Credit $1.10 | Spread $5.00 |
| Probability of success | 75% |
| Short delta | .35 |

The subject trade filled, with a 75% probability of success and a 25% reward potential. A littles less return for the risk than I’d like. However, since I didn’t get the slightly better fills on yesterday’s slight upward movement I suppose I’m OK with hitting par on a slight downward move (given that I’m selling calls).
The graph below is what I’ve been looking at, which could be a nice roll on reasonable support; 50% of a short term channel, based on a 10 year trend. It’s also worth noting that the RSI for DIA is at about 55, which is approximately where it’s been rolling for the 5-6 months. It’s been bouncing between 52-55 and 25-30.

Unfortunately this didn’t fill: SELL VERTICAL SPY – APR 08 140/141 CALL @.26.
Looking for SPY and IWM or RUT trades tomorrow…
I put these 2 on around 10am with about 10 cents of additional credit at that time. They both moved pretty close but didn’t fill and I wasn’t willing to adjust. Both trades had approx. 75% prob. of success and 30-35% return potential.
SELL VERTICAL SPY APR 08 141/142 CALL @.30
The mark for this made it to around .27.

SELL VERTICAL MNX APR 08 190/192.5 CALL @.75
The mark for this made it to around .70.

On 3/19 I bought a APR PUT on the (XLF) with a 28 strike and a delta of -.76. The financials are struggling. Although they bounced back on Thursday the 20th, I think with the climate of the market and economy this trade will be profitable before its expiration. Plus I needed a thrill.